Loading Report View…
fivenot10.co.uk scored 78 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A credible agency site that hides its sales pitch like a classified file.”
For a B2B tech PR agency obsessed with simplicity, this site sure enjoys making prospects work for every next step. It’s the digital equivalent of a mechanic handing you a clean showroom and then refusing to open the hood.

The good news: the page is crawlable, the canonical is correct, and the basics aren’t on fire. The bad news: Interactive drags to 10.9s while the page ships 2,075 KiB and leaves 226 KiB of JavaScript unused, so the browser is doing paperwork before it does the job. On the trust and demand side, the home page has 0 forms, 0 inputs, 0 social proof items, and only 1 CTA saying “Learn more,” which is a heroic way to avoid converting anyone.
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
It loads like a tidy brochure, then behaves like the browser got stuck in traffic.
The 2.9 s LCP says the hero is still doing too much work before users see the main message.
Even with low TBT, the 10.9 s interactive time shows the main thread still needs less nonsense and more restraint.
The 2.7 s FCP suggests early rendering could benefit from better caching of static assets.
SEO did the paperwork correctly, then left the social preview completely underdressed.
Six missing alt attributes leaves image meaning on the floor for both assistive tech and search context.
Without sameAs links, the site gives search engines less confidence about who the brand is across the web.
With no citability blocks, the page offers no clean fact chunks for search or AI systems to lift.
The layout looks professional, but the font stack and heading ladder are freelancing like they’ve never met.
Nineteen font families makes visual consistency harder than it should be for a simplicity-led brand.
The large image count needs a stronger design job so the page feels structured, not crowded.
Six missing alts means important visual content is being skipped by assistive technology.
The copy is articulate, but when it’s time to ask for action it suddenly becomes a whisper.
A single H1 is fine, but it needs to do more of the selling work since there’s so little CTA support.
The current sentence density is manageable, but skimmability matters for busy B2B readers.
One CTA is a thin sales signal for a lead-generation agency homepage.
Users get a clean front desk and a messy workshop behind it.
A dozen console errors is enough to undermine reliability and break user flows without obvious symptoms.
Broken fonts and SVG fetches create visible friction and can degrade both design and usability.
Consistent navigation helps users orient themselves across the site, especially when other elements are failing.
It’s very good at being found and very shy about being hired.
One vague CTA is too weak for a homepage expected to generate leads.
With no contact path, the site makes lead capture unnecessarily hard.
A lead-generation agency with zero visible proof is asking prospects to buy blind.
The good news: the page is crawlable, the canonical is correct, and the basics aren’t on fire. The bad news: Interactive drags to 10.9s while the page ships 2,075 KiB and leaves 226 KiB of JavaScript unused, so the browser is doing paperwork before it does the job. On the trust and demand side, the home page has 0 forms, 0 inputs, 0 social proof items, and only 1 CTA saying “Learn more,” which is a heroic way to avoid converting anyone.
Based on the category scores in this report, Copy is the strongest area while Conversion has the most room for improvement.
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://www.fivenot10.co.uk/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on May 28, 2026.
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.