Loading Report View…
merarang.com scored 65 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A gorgeous catalog trapped inside a machine that forgets how to arrive.”
Mera Rang has the confidence of a boutique and the runtime of a sleepy weekend sale. It’s dressed for cotton kurtas, but the homepage keeps tripping over its own hem before it can show the goods.

The site’s biggest problem is speed sabotage: Largest Contentful Paint hits 17.3s, Time to Interactive drags to 23.2s, and main-thread work burns 6.7s with 18 long tasks and 720ms of blocking. The page also ships 5,312 KiB total, with Lighthouse calling out 622 KiB of unused JavaScript, 654 KiB of image savings, and 1,260ms of render-blocking waste. SEO is structurally solid overall, but the page still has 2 H1s, 64 missing alt attributes, and the title is padded with stray navigation text like it got copy-pasted during a power outage.
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
The homepage arrives so late it needs a return policy of its own.
The hero content is the slowest meaningful paint, so reducing hero asset weight is the most direct way to cut the 17.3s LCP.
720ms of blocking is enough to make interactions feel sticky, so script deferral will improve responsiveness quickly.
A 4.3s First Contentful Paint suggests assets are arriving too slowly, and caching is the lowest-effort way to improve early paint.
Search visibility is doing fine, but the page structure still looks like it was edited by a stylish raccoon.
A 141-character title is bloated and likely to be truncated, weakening clarity in search results.
Two H1s dilute the main topic signal, and one clear H1 is cleaner for both users and crawlers.
Missing alt text weakens accessibility and deprives search engines of context for product imagery.
The visuals want to be elegant, but the page keeps dressing itself in too many opinions.
With 173 images, the layout needs clearer visual hierarchy so the abundance feels intentional rather than crowded.
Missing alt text hurts accessibility and leaves important product visuals under-described.
Nine font families create unnecessary inconsistency and make the page feel less cohesive.
It speaks in search phrases and mood words when it should speak in shopping decisions.
Two H1s weaken the page’s main message, and a single clear headline would improve clarity immediately.
Even though the average sentence length is reasonable, the overall density makes the content harder to skim quickly.
With only 3 CTAs and no dominant one, the page risks making shoppers work too hard to find the next step.
The experience keeps slipping on its own shoelaces before the customer gets to the rack.
Two console errors, including a CORS failure, can break interactions and undermine reliability.
Broken assets directly affect rendering and behavior, and the undefined Razorpay build path is especially risky.
775 inputs is far beyond normal ecommerce needs and will overwhelm users before purchase.
It offers enough side quests to distract shoppers from the actual purchase.
With only 3 CTAs and no obvious leader, the page needs one dominant action to guide purchase intent.
One piece of social proof is too sparse to support confidence unless it’s positioned where decisions happen.
A contact path exists, but conversion improves when shoppers can reach help quickly without navigating the form sprawl.
The site’s biggest problem is speed sabotage: Largest Contentful Paint hits 17.3s, Time to Interactive drags to 23.2s, and main-thread work burns 6.7s with 18 long tasks and 720ms of blocking. The page also ships 5,312 KiB total, with Lighthouse calling out 622 KiB of unused JavaScript, 654 KiB of image savings, and 1,260ms of render-blocking waste. SEO is structurally solid overall, but the page still has 2 H1s, 64 missing alt attributes, and the title is padded with stray navigation text like it got copy-pasted during a power outage.
Based on the category scores in this report, SEO is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://www.merarang.com/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on June 27, 2026.
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.