Loading Report View…
0/ 100
brunick.de Website Audit Report
brunick.de scored 82 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“Beautiful shell, confused sales desk.”
brunick.de looks like it was detailed by a perfectionist and handed to a receptionist with no script. The polish is real, but the homepage keeps acting like a classy business card when it should be closing the deal.
https://brunick.de/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The good news: performance and usability are mostly behaving, with a strong interactive time, negligible layout shift, and a near-perfect visual finish. The problem is execution around discovery and conversion: the meta description is empty, canonical is missing, there’s no schema, no OG/Twitter tags, and the only thing your broken script from p.brunick.de is converting is confidence into annoyance. Add the missing trust and sharing signals, because right now the site loads like a winner and introduces itself like it forgot why it exists.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for brunick.de
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
9601 PERFORMANCEPerformance score 946502 SEOSEO score 929803 DESIGNDesign score 988004 COPYWord count 7019605 UXConsole errors 14906 CONVERSIONConversion score 49
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
96
Performance score94LCP2.2 sCLS0.001Render-blocking savings1,000 ms
- 🔥Performance is doing the mechanic’s version of a clean bill of health: a 94 score, 1.5 s FCP, 2.2 s LCP, and 0.001 CLS. The engine sounds fine; the dashboard just has one ugly warning light.
💀
Fast enough to drive, but still leaving power and polish on the lift.
- →Eliminate the render-blocking resources by deferring non-critical CSS and inlining only above-the-fold styles.
- →Implement long-lived browser caching for static assets to capture the estimated 450 KiB savings.
- →Compress and resize the hero/image set to recover the estimated 194 KiB, then remove the 13 KiB of unused CSS and 11 KiB of legacy JavaScript.
02
SEO AUDIT
65
SEO score92Meta descriptionmissingCanonical tags0Schema blocks0
- 🔥An empty meta description with a 92 SEO score is like polishing a car and forgetting to put the license plate on it.
💀
Technically crawlable, strategically invisible.
- →Write a meta description under 160 characters and place the primary keyword in the first 60 characters.
- →Add a self-referencing canonical tag to the homepage so search engines stop guessing.
- →Implement Organization and WebSite JSON-LD, then add Open Graph and Twitter Card tags with a share-ready image and title.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
98
Design score98Missing alt attributes11First heading levelH2Font families3
- 🔥A 98 design score is gorgeous, but 11 images with 11 missing alt attributes is a couture outfit with no pockets for accessibility.
💀
Looks premium, but the semantic basics are dressed like understudies.
- →Add descriptive alt text to all 11 images, especially any hero or brand-critical visuals.
- →Promote the main page heading to an H1 and ensure subheadings descend logically from there.
- →Reduce font-family complexity by standardizing on one primary family and one fallback stack for tighter visual consistency.
04
COPY AUDIT
80
Word count701Sentence count54Title length10 charactersCitability blocks3
- 🔥The title is just "brunick.de," which is a bold choice if your strategy is making Google do all the interpretation work.
💀
Plenty of words, not enough point.
- →Replace the title with a specific, descriptive headline that includes the brand and what the site actually offers.
- →Write a concise value proposition near the top of the page that answers what, for whom, and why now.
- →Turn the 3 citability blocks into scannable proof points or case-study snippets with clearer outcomes and context.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
96
Console errors1Broken assets2Missing alt attributes11CTA count0
- 🔥The page has 1 console error and 2 broken asset entries for the same script, which is a lovely way to make the browser play mechanic and surgeon at once.
💀
Smooth surface, one broken hose, and no steering wheel.
- →Fix the 502 on https://p.brunick.de/script.js and remove the duplicate broken asset reference.
- →Add a visible primary CTA above the fold so the next action is obvious within the first screen.
- →Provide alt text for all images and recheck keyboard/screen-reader flow to prevent assistive dead ends.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
49
Conversion score49CTA count0Contact sectionmissingSocial proof count1
- 🔥A conversion score of 49 with 0 CTA elements is not a funnel; it’s a suggestion box with the lid welded shut.
💀
Everything is present except the part that asks for the sale.
- →Add one primary CTA above the fold and repeat it after the main proof section with action-oriented text.
- →Create a dedicated contact block with email, phone, or booking link so visitors don’t have to hunt for a way in.
- →Add stronger trust signals such as testimonials, client logos, or project outcomes near the first CTA and again near the forms.
Audit overview
brunick.de Audit Summary
The good news: performance and usability are mostly behaving, with a strong interactive time, negligible layout shift, and a near-perfect visual finish. The problem is execution around discovery and conversion: the meta description is empty, canonical is missing, there’s no schema, no OG/Twitter tags, and the only thing your broken script from p.brunick.de is converting is confidence into annoyance. Add the missing trust and sharing signals, because right now the site loads like a winner and introduces itself like it forgot why it exists.
Based on the category scores in this report, Design is the strongest area while Conversion has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated brunick.de
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://brunick.de/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on April 8, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.