Loading Report View…
0/ 100
yadukrishnan.co Website Audit Report
yadukrishnan.co scored 85 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A handsome homepage with trust issues and a broken backstage crew.”
Yadu Krishnan’s site shows up dressed for a keynote, then whispers “just trust me” from the wings like that’s a strategy. The page has the confidence of a landing page and the support system of a PowerPoint draft left open on a laptop.
https://yadukrishnan.co/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The front end is mostly stable, but the important stuff is slipping: LCP is 4.7 s, FCP is 2.7 s, there are 12 broken assets returning 429s, and 66 KiB of JavaScript is waiting around like it missed the memo. SEO is doing the bare minimum with a missing meta description, zero schema, and no social preview tags, which means discoverability and shareability are both getting left on read. Fix the broken assets and hero delivery first, because right now speed and trust are leaking while the business page asks visitors to believe in the blank space.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for yadukrishnan.co
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
8401 PERFORMANCELCP 4.7 s6202 SEOMeta description missing9803 DESIGNHeading level skips 49804 COPYWord count 5288005 UXConsole errors 118806 CONVERSIONCTA count 3
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
84
LCP4.7 sFCP2.7 sBroken assets12Unused JavaScript savings66 KiB
- 🔥Your LCP of 4.7 s arrives like a delayed space launch: dramatic, expensive, and already behind schedule.
💀
A page with 4.7 s LCP and 12 broken assets is less “fast website” and more “mission control panic with a loading bar.”
- →Compress the hero images and switch them to WebP/AVIF so the above-the-fold content stops dragging its feet.LCP: 4.7 sImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
The LCP is already slow, which strongly suggests the hero payload is too heavy for the first meaningful paint.
- →Defer non-critical JavaScript and reduce render-blocking resources so the page can stop waiting on its own baggage.TBT: 90 msImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Even with a modest TBT, render-blocking work still delays meaningful paint and keeps the page feeling sluggish.
- →Enable CDN caching and long cache TTLs for static assets so the same files aren’t reloaded like they’re brand new every visit.FCP: 2.7 sImpact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
A slow FCP benefits directly from caching, especially when the site is shipping repeated static assets and extra payload.
02
SEO AUDIT
62
Meta descriptionmissingSchema JSON-LD0Open Graph titleemptyTwitter cardempty
- 🔥The meta description is missing, so search results get a title and a shrug instead of a sales pitch.
💀
SEO here is a sleek suit with no name tag, no schema, and no social card — invisible in all the wrong ways.
- →Write a 140-160 character meta description with the primary keyword so search snippets stop freelancing.Meta description: missingImpact: highEffort: low
Why this matters
A missing meta description removes control over how the page is presented in search results.
- →Add JSON-LD structured data that matches the page type so the page can stop hiding its identity from crawlers.Schema: NoneImpact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
With zero schema, search engines get no machine-readable context for the page’s purpose.
- →Add Organization or WebSite schema with sameAs links to official profiles so the brand graph isn’t assembled from guesswork.Entity Graph: MissingImpact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
Missing entity signals weaken brand understanding and make the site less authoritative in search.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
98
Heading level skips4First heading levelh6Missing alt text1Images9
- 🔥The page has 9 images and 1 missing alt, so even the visual system forgot to label one piece of the evidence.
💀
Beautiful typography can’t rescue a heading ladder that looks like it was dropped down the stairs.
- →Add supporting imagery so the layout feels intentional instead of underfed.Images: 9Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
The page has a minimal visual stack, and the design notes call out empty space and weak support content.
- →Fix the missing alt text so the accessibility audit stops finding low-hanging fruit with no label.Missing Alt: 1Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
One missing alt attribute is enough to create an avoidable accessibility and SEO gap.
- →Test spacing and alignment across mobile and desktop breakpoints so the layout doesn’t keep improvising with the viewport.Viewport: PresentImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Viewport support exists, but responsive validation is still needed to protect the visual structure across devices.
04
COPY AUDIT
98
Word count528Sentence count47CTA count3CTA text repetitionContact x3
- 🔥The title says “Yadu Krishnan” while the H1 says “Grow Your Business With Me,” so the page is introducing itself and the offer in separate rooms.
💀
The copy can write paragraphs, but it still can’t commit to one sharp value proposition and a better CTA than “Contact.”
- →Tighten the headline so it states the value in one sentence instead of making visitors translate the page.H1 Count: 1Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The H1 exists, but the current wording is broad enough to under-explain the offer.
- →Break long paragraphs into skimmable bullets and shorter sentences so the page stops reading like a polite essay.Avg Words/Sentence: 11Impact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Shorter, more scannable copy improves comprehension and keeps visitors moving toward the CTA.
- →Make the primary CTA stand out instead of repeating “Contact” three times like a broken voicemail prompt.CTA Count: 3Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Three identical CTAs reduce specificity and weaken the persuasive path through the page.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
80
Console errors11Broken assets12Images9Missing alt text1
- 🔥There are 11 console errors, all from failed resource loads with status 429, so the experience starts with the browser filing complaints.
💀
Users are being asked to explore a page that’s actively tripping over 12 broken assets and 11 console errors.
- →Fix client-side JavaScript errors so interactions don’t fail silently in production.JS Errors: 11Impact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Eleven console errors indicate the page is throwing avoidable failures during runtime.
- →Repair failed asset URLs and deployment paths so scripts, images, and stylesheets load cleanly.Broken Assets: 12Impact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Broken assets directly degrade the experience and can undermine both visual content and interactivity.
- →Ensure consistent navigation and footer links across all pages so the site doesn’t feel stitched together at the edges.Nav/Footer: Nav / FooterImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Consistent site chrome helps users orient themselves and reduces dead-end browsing.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
88
CTA count3Form count0Input count0Social proof2
- 🔥There are 3 CTAs and every one says “Contact,” which is a choice so generic it could be a default button from 2014.
💀
This page wants inquiries, but it hides the easiest way to get them and then wonders why visitors hesitate.
- →Add a primary CTA above the fold that matches the core offer so the page stops making people guess.CTA Count: 3Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The current CTAs are repetitive and don’t clearly differentiate the main conversion action.
- →Offer a low-friction contact option such as a form, chat, or visible email so visitors can act without detective work.Contact Path: PresentImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
There is no form-based path, which raises the effort required to convert interest into a lead.
- →Place testimonials, logos, or stats near the CTA so the ask is backed by more than confidence and a nice font.Social Proof: 2Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Only two social proof elements leaves the CTA under-supported at the exact moment trust matters most.
Audit overview
yadukrishnan.co Audit Summary
The front end is mostly stable, but the important stuff is slipping: LCP is 4.7 s, FCP is 2.7 s, there are 12 broken assets returning 429s, and 66 KiB of JavaScript is waiting around like it missed the memo. SEO is doing the bare minimum with a missing meta description, zero schema, and no social preview tags, which means discoverability and shareability are both getting left on read. Fix the broken assets and hero delivery first, because right now speed and trust are leaking while the business page asks visitors to believe in the blank space.
Based on the category scores in this report, Design is the strongest area while SEO has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated yadukrishnan.co
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://yadukrishnan.co/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on June 30, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.