Loading Report View…
0/ 100
eprocurement.mjunction.in Website Audit Report
eprocurement.mjunction.in scored 60 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A procurement platform with identity issues and a paperwork allergy.”
mjPRO says “Procure Better,” then immediately makes you work for the basics like it’s a procurement intern on their first day. The page is busy, oddly formal, and somehow still manages to feel under-explained—bold move for a SaaS product asking buyers to contact sales.
https://eprocurement.mjunction.in/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The site lands at a mediocre overall score with performance at 50 and SEO at 28, which is a rough combo for a procurement SaaS that needs to look enterprise-ready. The page has 0 meta descriptions, 0 canonical tags, 0 H1s, 0 H2s, and 0 schema blocks, while the first heading starts at H5 and the hierarchy even skips from H3 to H5. On the UX side the basics are mostly intact, but the page still runs with 1 CTA, 0 internal links, and 0 social proof elements—so it asks for contact before earning the conversation.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for eprocurement.mjunction.in
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
5001 PERFORMANCEPerformance Score 50/1002802 SEOMeta Description missing6303 DESIGNFont Families 107204 COPYWord Count 1858805 UXInternal Links 07406 CONVERSIONCTA Count 1
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
50
Performance Score50/100PageSpeed API400Final URL Changedyes
- 🔥The reported performance score is 50, which is the kind of middle-ground energy that says, “We rendered eventually.”
💀
Performance is doing just enough to avoid embarrassment, then tripping over its own URL on the way out.
- →Add a PageSpeed API key to avoid rate limits and stop losing audit visibility.PageSpeed: PageSpeed API 400Impact: lowEffort: low
Why this matters
The audit is failing at the API layer, so you can’t reliably see performance details until the request succeeds.
- →Compress hero images and switch them to WebP/AVIF so the top of the page stops dragging the whole experience.LCP: UnknownImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
The hero area is visually busy and likely expensive to load, but the exact LCP is unavailable, so the safest fix is to reduce hero weight.
- →Defer non-critical JavaScript and reduce render-blocking resources so the page stops making users wait for the privilege of seeing it.TBT: UnknownImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Audit details are unavailable, but the reported performance score suggests render-blocking work may be contributing to delay.
02
SEO AUDIT
28
Meta DescriptionmissingCanonicalmissingH1 Count0Schema0 blocks
- 🔥Zero meta description tags on a page titled “mjPRO - Procure Better” is SEO doing the bare minimum and still missing the meeting.
💀
Search engines get a blank business card, a missing map, and a heading hierarchy held together by vibes.
- →Write a 140-160 character meta description with your primary keyword so the snippet actually sells mjPRO instead of shrugging.Meta description: missingImpact: highEffort: low
Why this matters
The page has 0 meta description tags, so search results have nothing intentional to show users.
- →Add a self-referencing canonical tag to declare the preferred URL for this login landing page.Canonical: missingImpact: highEffort: low
Why this matters
The canonicalUrl is empty and the page has 0 canonical tags, which can muddy indexing signals.
- →Add one H1 tag with your primary value proposition so the page stops introducing itself with H5 like it forgot the front door.H1 Count: 0Impact: highEffort: low
Why this matters
There are 0 H1 headings and 0 H2 headings, so the page lacks a clear primary topic for search engines and users.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
63
Font Families10Heading Count12First Heading Levelh5Missing Alt2
- 🔥Ten font families on one page is not typography; it’s a styling layoff report.
💀
The design is trying hard, but the font stack and heading ladder keep filing workplace complaints.
- →Reduce font families from 10 to 2-3 so the page stops looking like three templates arguing in a trench coat.Font Families: 10Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Ten distinct font families is unnecessary visual noise for a procurement SaaS page that should feel stable and enterprise-ready.
- →Fix missing alt text on the 2 affected images so the decorative and functional imagery both behave like adults.Missing Alt: 2Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
Two images lack alt text, which creates accessibility gaps and weakens semantic clarity.
- →Add supporting imagery deliberately so the 11 images feel intentional instead of like the layout borrowed props from a different site.Images: 11Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
The page already has 11 images, but the visual system still feels busy and under-supported rather than coherent.
04
COPY AUDIT
72
Word Count185Sentence Count19Meta DescriptionemptyCTA Count1
- 🔥185 words across 19 sentences is barely enough copy to convince a buyer, let alone a procurement team with actual questions.
💀
The copy is short, vague, and allergic to persuasion right when a buyer needs a reason to care.
- →Tighten the headline to state the value in one sentence so buyers know what mjPRO actually does before they scroll away.H1 Count: 0Impact: highEffort: low
Why this matters
There is no H1 carrying the core message, and the current title alone is doing all the heavy lifting.
- →Add a clear CTA and make the primary one stand out instead of leaving the page with a single generic “Contact.”CTA Count: 1Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The page exposes only 1 CTA, which is too little guidance for a subscription SaaS trying to move procurement teams to action.
- →Break the 185 words into skimmable bullets and shorter sentences so the page reads like a product page, not a memo.Avg Words/Sentence: 10Impact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
The content is extremely light, and while the sentence average is manageable, the page still needs more scan-friendly structure.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
88
Internal Links0Form Fields3Required Inputs0Footermissing
- 🔥Having 0 internal links out of 20 total links is a bold way to act like the entire site is a cul-de-sac.
💀
The experience is functional, but the navigation story ends right when the buyer starts looking for proof.
- →Ensure consistent navigation and footer links across all pages so the site has somewhere to go after the first impression.Nav/Footer: Nav / No footerImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
The page has a nav but no footer element, which weakens orientation and utility for buyers trying to explore.
- →Reduce the form to only the essentials so the 3 fields don’t feel like a paperwork preview.Form Fields: 3Impact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
A 3-field form is not terrible, but trimming unnecessary fields will make contact feel less like admin.
- →Smoke-test the page in the browser console and keep runtime errors at zero, because clean UX should stay boringly stable.JS Errors: 0Impact: lowEffort: low
Why this matters
No console errors were detected, so the fix is really about keeping the experience consistently clean over time.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
74
CTA Count1Form Fields3Required Inputs0Social Proof0
- 🔥One CTA labeled “Contact” is a skinny invitation for a subscription SaaS trying to win enterprise attention.
💀
It asks for contact before proving anything, which is a bold strategy for enterprise procurement.
- →Add a primary CTA above the fold that matches the core offer so the site stops hiding the ask in a generic label.CTA Count: 1Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
With only 1 CTA and the text “Contact,” the page needs a stronger action signal to move buyers forward.
- →Add testimonials, client logos, or user counts near the CTA so procurement teams see evidence before they commit time.Social Proof: 0Impact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
There are 0 social proof elements, which is a major weakness for a SaaS product asking enterprise buyers to engage.
- →Offer a low-friction contact option like a visible email, form, or chat path so the current contact route feels less like a riddle.Contact Path: PresentImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
A contact path exists, but the experience still needs a clearer, easier route for prospects to initiate conversation.
Audit overview
eprocurement.mjunction.in Audit Summary
The site lands at a mediocre overall score with performance at 50 and SEO at 28, which is a rough combo for a procurement SaaS that needs to look enterprise-ready. The page has 0 meta descriptions, 0 canonical tags, 0 H1s, 0 H2s, and 0 schema blocks, while the first heading starts at H5 and the hierarchy even skips from H3 to H5. On the UX side the basics are mostly intact, but the page still runs with 1 CTA, 0 internal links, and 0 social proof elements—so it asks for contact before earning the conversation.
Based on the category scores in this report, User Experience is the strongest area while SEO has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated eprocurement.mjunction.in
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://eprocurement.mjunction.in/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on June 17, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.