Loading Report View…
0/ 100
completeofficefitouts.com.au Website Audit Report
completeofficefitouts.com.au scored 89 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“All polish, no personality; the trust story is still under construction.”
Complete Office Fitouts has the kind of tidy professionalism that makes competitors nervous, then the homepage serves a gray, generic hero and calls it a day. It’s the office-fitout equivalent of showing up with a spotless apron and forgetting the ingredients, the logo wall, and the actual kitchen.
https://completeofficefitouts.com.au/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The site is genuinely quick: performance is 99, LCP is 2.0 s, TTI is 2.0 s, CLS is 0, and TBT is only 30 ms. But the polish gets dented by a robots.txt audit error, 13 missing image alts across 58 images, and weak social preview coverage because Twitter title, description, and image are incomplete. SEO is otherwise solid with a canonical that matches, indexable robots directives, and one valid JSON-LD block, but the brand still leaves trust and differentiation on the table.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for completeofficefitouts.com.au
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
9601 PERFORMANCEPerformance score 998202 SEOSEO score 927803 DESIGNFont families 208004 COPYWord count 2,1959605 UXUX score 949406 CONVERSIONConversion score 91
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
96
Performance score99LCP2.0 sTBT30 msPage weight684 KiB
- 🔥A 2.0 s Largest Contentful Paint is fine, but the 684 KiB page weight is dragging a suitcase through an empty hallway.
💀
Fast enough to brag about, still carrying unnecessary baggage like a contractor hauling spare plywood for attention.
- →Audit the largest images and replace any oversized hero or gallery files with WebP/AVIF versions under 200 KiB each.
- →Trim the 24 KiB of unused CSS by removing dead theme styles and deferring any page-specific rules not needed above the fold.
- →Preload the hero image and keep main-thread work under 0.5 s by deferring non-critical scripts until after first interaction.
02
SEO AUDIT
82
SEO score92Robots.txt errors1Schema parse errors0Twitter imagemissing
- 🔥Your robots.txt has 1 error found, which is a charming way to tell search engines, 'please mind the gap and also maybe don’t enter.'
💀
The technical SEO foundation is decent, but the robots file fumbled the door handle and social previews forgot to wear pants.
- →Fix the robots.txt syntax issue and re-test in Google Search Console so crawling instructions are clean.
- →Add twitter:title, twitter:description, and twitter:image to match the existing Open Graph data.
- →Change html lang from en-US to en-AU if the primary audience is Australian, then verify all localized signals match.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
78
Font families20Missing alt text13Headings27Images58
- 🔥There are 20 font families here, which is not typography — that’s a font clearance sale.
💀
Clean, professional, and just busy enough to make the design feel like it was assembled by committee at a stationery store.
- →Cut the font stack to one primary family plus one fallback stack; keep icons and body text from competing for attention.
- →Add descriptive alt text to all 13 missing images, especially any hero, service, or trust visuals.
- →Reduce heading clutter by collapsing adjacent h2/h3 sections where the content is already visually grouped.
04
COPY AUDIT
80
Word count2,195Sentence count125CTA repeats9Social proof count2
- 🔥2,195 words across 125 sentences is not a homepage — it’s a polite internal memo wearing a marketing badge.
💀
The copy works, but it speaks in competent wallpaper when the brand needs a little swagger and a lot more specificity.
- →Rewrite the H1 to include a sharper differentiator, such as project type, market, or outcome, instead of only saying the service name.
- →Break the longest paragraphs into tighter sections with scannable subheads and proof-led lead sentences.
- →Add 3–5 more trust elements near the top: client logos, certification badges, project stats, or a stronger testimonial block.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
96
UX score94Forms2Inputs59Missing alt text13
- 🔥59 inputs across 2 forms with 0 required fields is basically a form that shrugs at commitment.
💀
The experience is smooth, but the page is still acting like a helpful guide who forgot to write down the directions.
- →Mark the essential form fields as required so users know exactly what must be completed before submission.
- →Group the 59 inputs into shorter, progressive sections to reduce cognitive load on the quote journey.
- →Add alt text to the 13 missing images and verify keyboard focus order across the main navigation and forms.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
94
Conversion score91CTA placements9Social proof count2Forms2
- 🔥9 CTA placements with only 2 labels is a lot of enthusiasm for very little variety.
💀
Strong CTA energy, weak trust stacking — a very competent sales page that still needs to believe in itself.
- →Add a trust bar above the fold with client logos, testimonial snippets, or accreditation badges to support the primary CTA.
- →Replace some repeated CTA labels with intent-specific versions like 'Book a Site Visit' or 'Get a Fitout Estimate' to sharpen action.
- →Shorten the forms by removing optional fields upfront and only asking for deeper project details after the first conversion step.
Audit overview
completeofficefitouts.com.au Audit Summary
The site is genuinely quick: performance is 99, LCP is 2.0 s, TTI is 2.0 s, CLS is 0, and TBT is only 30 ms. But the polish gets dented by a robots.txt audit error, 13 missing image alts across 58 images, and weak social preview coverage because Twitter title, description, and image are incomplete. SEO is otherwise solid with a canonical that matches, indexable robots directives, and one valid JSON-LD block, but the brand still leaves trust and differentiation on the table.
Based on the category scores in this report, Performance is the strongest area while Design has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated completeofficefitouts.com.au
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://completeofficefitouts.com.au/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on May 16, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.