Loading Report View…
0/ 100
tomsgates.com Website Audit Report
tomsgates.com scored 92 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“Actually Decent — we're a little disappointed.”
https://www.tomsgates.com/
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for tomsgates.com
SavageAudit identified 28 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
81
- 🔥Your load time is doing that awkward shuffle between acceptable and embarrassing.
- →Compress hero images and switch to WebP/AVIF format.LCP: 3.7 sImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Largest Contentful Paint is 3.7 s, so the main visual payload is a likely speed bottleneck.
- →Defer non-critical JavaScript and reduce render-blocking resources.TBT: 0 msImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Total Blocking Time is 0 ms, which points to main-thread JavaScript friction.
- →Enable CDN caching and serve static assets with long cache TTLs.FCP: 3.2 sImpact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
First Contentful Paint is 3.2 s; caching keeps repeat visits from paying the same network cost.
02
SEO AUDIT
93
IndexabilityIndexableCanonicalSelfAI CrawlersOpen 4/4AI HintsMissingEntity Graph2 profilesCitability2 blocksSocial PreviewHealthyHeadings20 cleanRedirects0 hopsSchemaWebPage / ReadAction
- 🔥SEO is behaving. We're almost disappointed.
- →Add descriptive alt text to every meaningful image.Missing Alt: 7Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
7 image(s) are missing alt text.
- →Publish llms.txt or ai.txt with your priority URLs, core docs, and support paths so AI crawlers can find the pages you actually want cited.AI Hints: MissingImpact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
No llms.txt or ai.txt file was detected for AI discovery guidance.
- →Expand sameAs coverage to at least 3-5 official profiles so AI systems can reconcile your brand across the web.Entity Graph: 2 profilesImpact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Only 2 sameAs profile link(s) were found.
- →Increase the number of citation-ready answer blocks so each important question has a self-contained, extraction-friendly paragraph.Citability: 2 blocksImpact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
Only 2 citation-ready content block(s) were detected.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
93
- 🔥The visuals hold up. We can't roast what isn't there to roast.
- →Add supporting imagery so the layout feels intentional, not empty.Images: 30Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
The page has 30 image(s), which limits visual hierarchy and proof.
- →Fix missing alt text to pass accessibility audits.Missing Alt: 7Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
7 image(s) are missing alt text in the extracted HTML.
- →Test spacing and alignment across mobile and desktop breakpoints.Viewport: PresentImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Responsive evidence exists, but layout should still be checked across breakpoints.
04
COPY AUDIT
96
- 🔥The messaging is clear enough to survive the scroll.
- →Tighten the headline to state your value in one sentence.H1 Count: 1Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The page has 1 H1 tag(s), so the primary message may not be clear.
- →Break long paragraphs into skimmable bullets and shorter sentences.Avg Words/Sentence: 19Impact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Average sentence length is 19 words based on extracted text.
- →Add a clear CTA - make the primary one stand out.CTA Count: 3Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The extracted page contains 3 call-to-action element(s).
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
98
JS Errors0Broken Assets0Forms2 / 8 fields
- 🔥UX flows are surprisingly smooth. Someone actually thought this through.
- →Ensure consistent navigation and footer links across all pages.Nav/Footer: Nav / FooterImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Navigation and footer presence shape whether visitors can recover from a dead end.
- →Smoke-test the page in the browser console and keep runtime errors at zero.JS Errors: 0Impact: lowEffort: low
Why this matters
No runtime console errors were captured, so this is a maintenance check.
- →Monitor failed asset requests in production so broken scripts and styles do not slip through.Broken Assets: 0Impact: lowEffort: low
Why this matters
No broken assets were captured, so this is a maintenance check.
- →Reduce form fields (currently 8) to only the essentials.Form Fields: 8Impact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
The extracted page contains 8 input field(s).
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
96
- 🔥CTAs are visible and persuasive. Keep that energy.
- →Add a primary CTA above the fold that matches your core offer.CTA Count: 3Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The extracted page contains 3 call-to-action element(s).
- →Offer a low-friction contact option - form, chat, or visible email.Contact Path: PresentImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
A contact signal exists, but conversion paths should remain obvious.
- →Include social proof or trust signals (testimonials, logos, stats) near the CTA.Social Proof: 1Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
1 social proof signal(s) were detected, but placement near the CTA matters.
Audit overview
tomsgates.com Audit Summary
Actually Decent — we're a little disappointed.
Based on the category scores in this report, User Experience is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated tomsgates.com
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://www.tomsgates.com/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on July 21, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.