Loading Report View…
changehr.kz scored 63 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A recruitment site with proof hiding in the basement and the front door left unlabeled.”
Change HR brought a whole office worth of content, then forgot to make the important part obvious. It’s like a courtroom exhibit: plenty of paper, no clean witness statement, and the jury is still waiting for the actual answer.

The site’s biggest self-own is speed and interaction: LCP is 3.8 s, TBT is 1,850 ms, interactive time drags to 24.5 s, and main-thread work sits at 5.8 s. SEO is mostly healthy, but the page is leaking quality through 111 missing alt texts, 8 broken assets, no organization schema, and no AI hint file; fix the blocking JavaScript and broken assets first because that directly affects trust, lead capture, and how fast employers can actually use the page.
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
It loads like it’s interviewing the browser for the job.
The largest contentful paint is slow enough to hurt first impression and lead intent, especially on a lead-generation page.
Heavy blocking work is keeping the page from becoming usable quickly, which can cost contact submissions from impatient employers.
The first paint is decent, but better caching helps preserve that advantage as the rest of the page loads.
Technically indexable, but brand authority is still arriving without a name tag.
A clipped title weakens search clarity for employers looking for recruiting help in Kazakhstan and the UAE.
Missing alt text is an accessibility and semantic-loss problem across a page with 113 images.
There is no AI hint file, which leaves discovery and citation intent on the table.
Visually competent, accessibility-wise in a witness protection program.
A large image count with weak visual storytelling makes the page feel busy without adding brand proof.
Accessibility is badly broken at scale, and this many missing alts is not a rounding error.
Too many font families dilute visual consistency and make the page feel less controlled.
It writes like a pitch deck, then forgets to ask for the lead.
A single H1 is fine, but the headline needs to do more of the selling for a recruitment agency.
The page is text-heavy, and skimmability matters when employers are scanning for vacancy-closing proof.
A lead-generation page without a CTA is doing branding cosplay instead of selling contact sales.
The interface keeps tripping over its own shoelaces before users can act.
Two visible console errors mean real interaction risk, and the broken Tawk.to integration is already proving it.
Broken assets are user-facing failures, not dev trivia, and they directly erode trust.
A long form makes lead capture feel expensive before the user even decides to enquire.
It wants leads, but it forgot the button, the proof, and the easy path.
No primary CTA means no clean path from interest to contact sales.
The page technically has contact options, but they need to be easier to reach and understand.
A recruitment agency sells credibility, and the current proof is too far from the decision point.
The site’s biggest self-own is speed and interaction: LCP is 3.8 s, TBT is 1,850 ms, interactive time drags to 24.5 s, and main-thread work sits at 5.8 s. SEO is mostly healthy, but the page is leaking quality through 111 missing alt texts, 8 broken assets, no organization schema, and no AI hint file; fix the blocking JavaScript and broken assets first because that directly affects trust, lead capture, and how fast employers can actually use the page.
Based on the category scores in this report, SEO is the strongest area while User Experience has the most room for improvement.
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://changehr.kz/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on July 1, 2026.
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.