Loading Report View…
i2cinc.com scored 92 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A trustworthy fintech facade with just enough loose bolts to annoy buyers.”
The site shows up in a tailored suit and still forgets the name tag. For a banking and payments company, it’s wild how much of the trust story is implied instead of actually shown.

The fundamentals are strong, but the homepage still leaves performance and structure money on the table. Largest Contentful Paint is 3.1 s, First Contentful Paint is 2.2 s, and the root document takes 430 ms, so the opening stretch plays like a decent quarterback getting tackled by its own hero assets. SEO is mostly healthy with canonical, robots, and schema in place, but the first heading level is h6, 2 images are missing alt text, and link text coverage is weak, which is a strange way to ask search engines for trust.
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
Fast enough to avoid embarrassment, slow enough to lose the opening drive.
The hero is slow enough to push LCP past the preferred benchmark, so shrinking those assets should move the biggest visible render earlier.
FCP is lagging, and better caching can reduce the time it takes to assemble the first visible content.
The audit flags render-blocking savings of 720 ms, so pushing non-essential scripts out of the critical path should improve the early load experience.
Search engines can read the page, but the structure still feels like it was assembled in a hurry.
Starting at h6 weakens semantic structure, and the page should not make search engines climb five extra floors to find the headline.
Two missing alt attributes leave image context incomplete and weaken accessibility plus image-search signals.
There are no citation-ready blocks, which means the page is less likely to get cleanly extracted for answer surfaces.
The visual system is competent, but the page still leans on clutter and hierarchy confusion to do the heavy lifting.
The composition is visually thin in places despite having many assets, so better supporting imagery would fill the empty-feeling areas.
Two images are missing alt text, which makes the presentation feel unfinished and less inclusive.
The viewport is present, but a layout with 59 buttons deserves stress-testing before it turns into a mobile traffic jam.
The messaging knows the industry buzzwords but still won’t just say what the company actually does in one clean shot.
The current H1 is abstract, and a banking/payments homepage needs immediate clarity before the reader starts decoding slogans.
The homepage is wordy enough that skimmability matters, especially for busy B2B buyers.
Seventeen CTAs dilute the call to action, and the page needs one obvious path rather than a committee meeting.
Usable, yes. Calm, no. The interface is one crowded boardroom away from asking visitors to bring a map.
The site already has a dense link surface, so consistency matters if users are going to recover their bearings quickly.
Two fields is already lean, but the homepage still benefits from every bit of friction removed in a high-consideration sales flow.
Zero runtime errors is good, and keeping it that way protects the already decent experience from turning into a surprise bug parade.
The page is almost trying to convert, but the proof, priority, and pressure are still underdressed.
The page has too many competing actions, so one dominant CTA is needed to stop the click scatter.
Two proof elements are light for a high-consideration B2B sale, especially in banking and payments where trust has to show up early.
A contact path exists, but visible, low-friction options help turn cautious enterprise interest into actual conversations.
The fundamentals are strong, but the homepage still leaves performance and structure money on the table. Largest Contentful Paint is 3.1 s, First Contentful Paint is 2.2 s, and the root document takes 430 ms, so the opening stretch plays like a decent quarterback getting tackled by its own hero assets. SEO is mostly healthy with canonical, robots, and schema in place, but the first heading level is h6, 2 images are missing alt text, and link text coverage is weak, which is a strange way to ask search engines for trust.
Based on the category scores in this report, Conversion is the strongest area while Design has the most room for improvement.
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://www.i2cinc.com/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on June 27, 2026.
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.