Loading Report View…
collierysmokehouse.co.uk scored 69 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“Beautiful branding, then the homepage arrives late and undersells the booking.”
Colliery Smokehouse looks like it knows how to build appetite, then trips over its own serving tray. The site has the confidence of a coal-fired grill and the patience of a queue on a rainy Saturday.

The good news: SEO is doing the heavy lifting, with a clean canonical, sitemap, robots.txt, and no schema parse errors. The bad news: performance is the party crasher — Largest Contentful Paint is 23.0s, Interactive is 23.0s, Speed Index is 8.0s, and total page weight is 7,973 KiB with 4,388 KiB of cache savings and 4,150 ms of render-blocking savings sitting on the table. CLS is 0.381 with 2 layout shifts, and there’s also 1 broken media asset, which is not exactly the vibe for a restaurant selling smoke, fire, and trust.
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
A barbecue site with this much waiting time is basically a digital smoke ring: all atmosphere, no arrival.
An LCP of 23.0s is the clearest sign the hero payload is too heavy for a restaurant homepage.
Even with TBT at 0 ms, the render-blocking savings of 4,150 ms show the page is still dragging its feet during paint.
A 3.0s first contentful paint plus 4,388 KiB of cache savings means the browser is doing unnecessary repeat work.
Search engines get a mostly clean reservation card; the content structure and broken media still wander in late wearing the wrong shoes.
Sixteen missing alt attributes is a lot of visual context to leave on the cutting-room floor.
AI hint files are missing, so the site gives crawlers less guidance than a badly lit car park.
The heading skips are explicitly documented, and structured headings help search engines and users understand the page faster.
The design has the right mood, then gets sloppy with missing context, extra typefaces, and a video that refuses to show up for work.
The visual inventory is present, but the support story is still thin for a restaurant that should sell atmosphere fast.
Sixteen missing alt attributes is a clear accessibility and quality issue, not a minor tidy-up.
Seven fonts dilute the visual hierarchy and make the design feel less deliberate.
The writing has appetite, but the headline and CTA repetition leave the booking pitch underseasoned.
The current H1 is strong on tone but weak on explicit value and action for booking-minded visitors.
The page is readable, but the content density is still light for a local restaurant landing page.
Sixteen CTAs without a clearly dominant primary action creates noise where the booking path should be obvious.
The user journey is mostly usable, but the shifting layout and broken asset make the page feel a bit too eager to spill the gravy.
One broken asset is enough to break the flow, especially when it’s a visible media file on the homepage.
Six fields is survivable, but for a restaurant booking flow it’s still more work than needed.
Consistency reduces the chance that users feel lost once they move beyond the homepage.
The booking path is technically there, but it’s dressed like a menu item and expected to perform like a reservation engine.
Sixteen distributed CTAs without a single dominant booking action weakens the main conversion path.
The contact path exists, but it should be more obviously usable for quick local diners.
With only one social proof item, placement matters more because trust has to be established fast.
The good news: SEO is doing the heavy lifting, with a clean canonical, sitemap, robots.txt, and no schema parse errors. The bad news: performance is the party crasher — Largest Contentful Paint is 23.0s, Interactive is 23.0s, Speed Index is 8.0s, and total page weight is 7,973 KiB with 4,388 KiB of cache savings and 4,150 ms of render-blocking savings sitting on the table. CLS is 0.381 with 2 layout shifts, and there’s also 1 broken media asset, which is not exactly the vibe for a restaurant selling smoke, fire, and trust.
Based on the category scores in this report, SEO is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://collierysmokehouse.co.uk/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on June 16, 2026.
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.