Loading Report View…
ahanagroup.in scored 68 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A real estate site dressed like a brochure, then tripped over its own heels.”
Ahana Group brought the “Redefine Living” pitch, but the homepage looks like the before photo of a launch. It’s got enough content to talk, yet somehow still manages to feel unfinished, overstuffed, and oddly allergic to making a site visit feel urgent.

The biggest problem is performance: Largest Contentful Paint is 26.0 s, First Contentful Paint is 15.4 s, interactive lands at 26.8 s, and the page carries 35,436 KiB with 28,872 KiB possible cache savings plus 708 KiB unused JavaScript. On top of that, 12 assets are failing with HTTP 429 and render-blocking resources could save 8,930 ms, so the site is making homebuyers wait like they’re trying to get into a sold-out open house. Fix the load path first; until the homepage is visible and stable, the missing canonical, empty meta description, absent schema, and weak CTA hierarchy are just extra ways to lose trust and site-visit bookings.
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
The homepage is so heavy and slow it turns a site visit into a waiting room.
The page’s main content arrives absurdly late, so shrinking the hero payload is the fastest way to make the homepage feel like a site instead of a hostage situation.
Even with TBT reading clean, the page is still being delayed by blocking assets, and the render-blocking audit shows room to recover 8,930 ms.
First paint is arriving far too late for a property site, and the audit already points to large cache savings that would get content onto the screen sooner.
Search engines get a homepage with no caption, no identity, and no structured context.
An empty snippet wastes search visibility for a local real estate brand that depends on trust and intent.
Without a canonical, search engines have to guess which URL is the real version, which is not the kind of mystery you want in SEO.
Structured data is completely absent, which means the homepage is skipping rich-result and brand-context cues that could help discoverability.
The layout has enough assets to look substantial, then immediately falls apart under its own structure.
The page has plenty of image slots, but 12 broken assets leave the design looking like it lost a fight with the CDN.
Too many type families make the page feel less like a premium property brand and more like a font sampler with a mortgage.
Alt text is complete here, so this is a low-priority accessibility insurance policy rather than a rescue mission.
The words are present, but the homepage still talks like it can’t decide what to say first.
Three H1s and repeated headline text dilute the message, which is deadly on a real estate homepage where clarity should sell the site visit.
Eight CTAs split attention, and a booking-focused site needs one dominant path to the site visit form.
The copy is readable, but the page still benefits from faster scanning because homebuyers are not here to earn a literature degree.
The user experience is a locked door with a fancy sign on it.
A dozen console errors means the experience is literally breaking in front of users, which is not a great look for a site-visit funnel.
Twelve 429 failures leave visible holes in the interface and can make the homepage feel unfinished or abandoned.
Seven fields is not outrageous, but for a primary booking action it is still enough to slow down leads who already took the first step.
It asks for bookings, but it doesn’t earn the confidence required to get them.
With eight scattered CTAs, the page lacks a single booking command that can actually drive intent.
Two trust signals is not enough for a property decision, especially when the site visit is the primary conversion.
The contact path exists, but making it easier to reach you can catch buyers before they bounce to a cleaner competitor.
The biggest problem is performance: Largest Contentful Paint is 26.0 s, First Contentful Paint is 15.4 s, interactive lands at 26.8 s, and the page carries 35,436 KiB with 28,872 KiB possible cache savings plus 708 KiB unused JavaScript. On top of that, 12 assets are failing with HTTP 429 and render-blocking resources could save 8,930 ms, so the site is making homebuyers wait like they’re trying to get into a sold-out open house. Fix the load path first; until the homepage is visible and stable, the missing canonical, empty meta description, absent schema, and weak CTA hierarchy are just extra ways to lose trust and site-visit bookings.
Based on the category scores in this report, Copy is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://ahanagroup.in/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on July 4, 2026.
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.