Loading Report View…
0/ 100
grandworks.co Website Audit Report
grandworks.co scored 60 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A confident brochure trapped in a slow-motion pileup.”
GrandWorks brought the nice suit, the sharp pitch, and then tripped over its own feet on the way to the meeting. The page wants to sell end-to-end execution, but the site itself keeps showing up like a demo reel with stage fright.
https://grandworks.co/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The strongest signals are discoverability basics: the page is crawlable, canonical is correct, robots.txt is open, and SEO is otherwise strong. But performance is dragging the whole agency pitch through the mud: LCP is 10.2s, FCP is 3.4s, TBT is 7,530ms, main-thread work hits 40.0s, and interactive takes 47.4s, which is how you turn a polished sales page into a patience test. Fix the hero/media and heavy JavaScript first, because speed is directly undercutting trust, contact intent, and the ability to convert businesses that expect delivery discipline from an app and e-commerce partner.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for grandworks.co
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
2401 PERFORMANCELCP 10.2 s8502 SEOSEO score 1006503 DESIGNHeading count 1448504 COPYWord count 6334705 UXBroken Assets 26406 CONVERSIONCTA Count 7
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
24
LCP10.2 sFCP3.4 sTBT7,530 msMain thread work40.0 s
- 🔥Your LCP of 10.2s is moving like overtime in a game nobody asked to watch.
💀
The page starts the race by slipping on its own shoelaces and spends the rest of the match on the floor.
- →Compress the hero media and convert it to WebP/AVIF so the biggest above-the-fold asset stops dragging LCP down.LCP: 10.2 sImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
The largest contentful paint is clearly too slow, and the hero is the most likely thing making users wait before they can judge the agency.
- →Defer non-critical JavaScript and trim render-blocking resources so the main thread stops being occupied for 7,530 ms.TBT: 7,530 msImpact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Total Blocking Time is extremely high, which means the page is busy pretending to work instead of becoming usable.
- →Enable CDN caching and long TTLs for static assets so the 3.4 s first paint stops arriving like a delayed apology.FCP: 3.4 sImpact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
A slow first contentful paint hurts the first impression and makes the sales page feel heavier than the pitch should be.
02
SEO AUDIT
85
SEO score100Schema JSON-LD0H1 Count2Missing Alt101
- 🔥SEO is doing fine, but the page still forgot to bring schema, which is like showing up to a client pitch without a deck.
💀
The crawlable basics are intact, but the content hierarchy is dressed like a team that heard structure was optional.
- →Add JSON-LD for Organization and WebSite so the brand has structured context instead of relying on the browser to read minds.Schema: NoneImpact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
Schema is completely absent, which leaves rich-result context and entity understanding on the table.
- →Consolidate the page to one H1 and move supporting sections to H2/H3 so the heading tree stops skipping like a broken playlist.H1 Count: 2Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Two H1s weaken the page’s top-level signal and make the structure less clear for search engines and assistive tech.
- →Add descriptive alt text to every meaningful image, because 101 missing alts is not an edge case, it is a full-blown content blackout.Missing Alt: 101Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
The site uses heavy visual content, but most of it is invisible to non-visual users and less useful to search crawlers.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
65
Heading count144H1 Count2Missing Alt101Font Families16
- 🔥With 144 headings and only 2 H1s, the layout reads like a spreadsheet trying to become a brand story.
💀
The page looks professional from a distance, then the content structure and font stack start arguing in public.
- →Add supporting imagery where the layout feels thin so the page reads like a designed system, not a gallery that forgot its caption layer.Images: 106Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
The page has a very high image count, but without enough supporting structure the visual weight can feel scattered instead of intentional.
- →Fix missing alt text across the image set so accessibility and image comprehension stop being collateral damage.Missing Alt: 101Impact: mediumEffort: medium
Why this matters
This is a large accessibility hole and it also weakens the clarity of the visual presentation for assistive users.
- →Reduce the font stack to 2-3 families so the page stops behaving like it invited every typeface to the same family reunion.Font Families: 16Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Sixteen detected font families, including malformed entries, creates inconsistency and raises the odds of rendering weirdness.
04
COPY AUDIT
85
Word count633Sentence count40H1 Count2CTA Count7
- 🔥Two H1s means the homepage is trying to make two first impressions at once, which is how headlines get clingy.
💀
The copy knows the service, but the page keeps speaking in duplicate headlines and repetitive CTA echoes.
- →Tighten the headline into one sentence that states the value clearly, because two H1s are making the pitch split its attention.H1 Count: 2Impact: highEffort: low
Why this matters
The current headline structure dilutes the core promise instead of landing one crisp agency value proposition.
- →Break longer sections into shorter sentences and bullets where needed so the 40-sentence page stops asking users to marathon the pitch.Avg Words/Sentence: 16Impact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
The copy is readable enough, but the structure can be made faster to scan for busy buyers comparing agencies.
- →Make one primary CTA stand out and stop repeating the same CTA language seven times like it’s trying to win points by volume.CTA Count: 7Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
Too many CTAs without a clear primary action can blur the path to contact and weaken the sales intent.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
47
Broken Assets2Missing Alt101Heading count144Link count96
- 🔥Two broken assets means the page has a couple of self-inflicted stumbles right where trust should be smooth.
💀
The page is usable, but it still tosses users a few broken steps and a lot of visual clutter to climb over.
- →Repair the failed media and fetch paths so assets stop dying in transit and the page loads cleanly.Broken Assets: 2Impact: highEffort: medium
Why this matters
Two failed assets are visible user-facing defects, not harmless background noise.
- →Smoke-test the page in-browser and keep runtime errors at zero, so the experience stays boring in the best possible way.JS Errors: 0Impact: lowEffort: low
Why this matters
Runtime errors are already at zero, so the task is to preserve that and catch regressions before they show up.
- →Ensure consistent navigation and footer links across all pages.Nav/Footer: Nav / FooterImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
Navigation and footer presence shape whether visitors can recover from a dead end.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
64
CTA Count7Forms0Social Proof2Internal Link Count0
- 🔥Seven CTAs and three buttons with no forms, no inputs, and no required inputs is a lot of waving and not much closing.
💀
The page keeps asking for attention, but the path to contact is underbuilt and the proof is too thin for the ask.
- →Add a primary CTA above the fold that matches the core offer so the page has one obvious next step instead of seven competing ones.CTA Count: 7Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The current CTA set is busy, but not clearly prioritized, which weakens the path to sales contact.
- →Offer a low-friction contact option such as a short form or visible email so interested businesses don’t have to hunt for a way in.Contact Path: PresentImpact: lowEffort: medium
Why this matters
A contact path exists, but the page lacks a simple capture mechanism that would reduce drop-off for warm leads.
- →Place stronger social proof near the CTA, because two proof items is a very small chorus for a site asking businesses to trust it with launch work.Social Proof: 2Impact: mediumEffort: low
Why this matters
The site has some proof, but not enough visible reassurance next to the conversion action.
Audit overview
grandworks.co Audit Summary
The strongest signals are discoverability basics: the page is crawlable, canonical is correct, robots.txt is open, and SEO is otherwise strong. But performance is dragging the whole agency pitch through the mud: LCP is 10.2s, FCP is 3.4s, TBT is 7,530ms, main-thread work hits 40.0s, and interactive takes 47.4s, which is how you turn a polished sales page into a patience test. Fix the hero/media and heavy JavaScript first, because speed is directly undercutting trust, contact intent, and the ability to convert businesses that expect delivery discipline from an app and e-commerce partner.
Based on the category scores in this report, SEO is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated grandworks.co
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://grandworks.co/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on July 2, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.