Loading Report View…
0/ 100
computerworks.ca Website Audit Report
computerworks.ca scored 67 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A polished front door hiding a trust leak and a conversion drought.”
ComputerWorks dressed the lobby nicely, then forgot to put anyone at the desk. The site talks business IT support like a pro, but the page structure, generic hero, and weak proof make it feel like a sales deck that wandered off without its closing slide.
https://www.computerworks.ca/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The good news: SEO is carrying the team with a strong score, a matching canonical, valid robots access, and a sitemap in place. The bad news: performance is kneecapped by a 9.8s LCP, 9.2s Speed Index, 1,505 KiB page weight, and 1,650 ms of render-blocking savings left on the table. Add 8 console font CORS errors, 6 broken assets, 536 KiB of unused JavaScript, and a page that doesn’t become interactive until 9.9s, and the experience starts looking less like managed IT and more like unmanaged chaos.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for computerworks.ca
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
6001 PERFORMANCELCP 9.8s8702 SEOSEO Score 100/1006403 DESIGNFirst Heading Level 56504 COPYWord Count 2,0076105 UXConsole Errors 86406 CONVERSIONForms 0
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
60
LCP9.8sSpeed Index9.2sTotal Byte Weight1,505 KiBRender-Blocking Savings1,650 ms
- 🔥Your 9.8s LCP is moving at the speed of a quarterly budget approval, not a business IT homepage.
💀
A bloated page with enough wasted bytes to bankrupt a patience account.
- →Defer non-critical scripts and inline only the critical CSS needed for the first viewport.
- →Trim the 536 KiB of unused JavaScript and the 12 KiB of unused CSS before adding any new features.
- →Enable long-lived caching and compress the page assets to recover the estimated 695 KiB savings.
02
SEO AUDIT
87
SEO Score100/100Schema Types6Heading Level Skips4Console Errors8
- 🔥SEO is the one department here that read the memo: a 100 score, canonical in place, and a sitemap ready to work.
💀
Strong technical SEO wrapped around a heading outline that behaves like a broken org chart.
- →Rewrite the heading structure so the page starts with one H1, then uses H2s and H3s in order with no skips.
- →Add Product schema where relevant and expand JSON-LD context for services, FAQs, and organization details.
- →Fix the font CORS errors so render and crawl behavior stop tripping over broken resource loads.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
64
First Heading Level5Missing Alt Attributes18Font Families15Heading Count53
- 🔥The visual hierarchy is clear, but your first heading level is 5, which is a brave choice if the goal is confusion.
💀
Professional polish on top, structural vandalism underneath.
- →Reduce the font stack to 2–3 families and standardize weights across the page.
- →Add descriptive alt text for all 18 missing images, especially any service or trust visuals.
- →Rebuild the page sections so headings support the layout instead of cosplay as decorative text.
04
COPY AUDIT
65
Word Count2,007Sentence Count82CTA Count18Social Proof Count2
- 🔥At 2,007 words and 82 sentences, this homepage has the energy of a full internal policy manual.
💀
The page talks a lot, says the same thing twice, and still forgets the receipts.
- →Cut the homepage copy down to one sharp value prop, three service bullets, and one trust-building proof section.
- →Replace repeated generic CTAs with intent-based labels like 'Book a Network Review' or 'Request Support'.
- →Break the dense citability paragraph into short scannable chunks with subheads and benefit-led language.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
61
Console Errors8Broken Assets6FCP2.8sInteractive Time9.9s
- 🔥Eight console errors and 6 broken assets mean the page arrives like a managed service contract with missing pages.
💀
The interface is trying to be helpful while tripping over its own resource loading.
- →Serve fonts from the same origin or add proper CORS headers so the blocked files actually load.
- →Investigate the 6 broken assets, especially the 4 font failures and 2 aborted analytics requests.
- →Prioritize above-the-fold rendering so the first meaningful content appears before users start freelancing as patience testers.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
64
Forms0Buttons3CTA Instances18External Links16
- 🔥There are 0 forms and 0 inputs, so lead capture is technically happening in your imagination.
💀
A busy page with nowhere obvious to convert and no strong reason to trust it.
- →Add a short contact form above the fold with 3–4 fields and one primary action.
- →Turn the main CTA into a single conversion path like 'Request a Free IT Assessment' and repeat it consistently.
- →Add trust signals near the primary CTA: client logos, testimonials, certifications, or partner badges.
Audit overview
computerworks.ca Audit Summary
The good news: SEO is carrying the team with a strong score, a matching canonical, valid robots access, and a sitemap in place. The bad news: performance is kneecapped by a 9.8s LCP, 9.2s Speed Index, 1,505 KiB page weight, and 1,650 ms of render-blocking savings left on the table. Add 8 console font CORS errors, 6 broken assets, 536 KiB of unused JavaScript, and a page that doesn’t become interactive until 9.9s, and the experience starts looking less like managed IT and more like unmanaged chaos.
Based on the category scores in this report, SEO is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated computerworks.ca
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://www.computerworks.ca/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on May 20, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.