Loading Report View…
0/ 100
oscemediko.id Website Audit Report
oscemediko.id scored 53 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“Mission control is glowing, but the spacecraft barely leaves the launchpad.”
OSCE Mediko looks like it hired a great designer and then asked the browser to sprint through molasses. The branding is trying to say “med-easy,” while the page keeps screaming “please wait, we lost telemetry.”
https://www.oscemediko.id/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The good news: the visual system is strong, with a clear hierarchy and solid trust signals. The bad news: performance is dragging the whole experience into the runway lights—LCP is 17.2s, Speed Index is 36.2s, interactive time is 143.5s, and Total Blocking Time hits 11,700ms. You’re also hauling 66,426 KiB of page weight, 7,192 KiB of unused JavaScript, and 20 long tasks, which is how a site turns a good first impression into a waiting room with ambitions.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for oscemediko.id
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
1901 PERFORMANCELCP 17.2s6202 SEOMeta description missing8703 DESIGNMissing alt attributes 1666704 COPYWord count 4,3883505 UXFCP 4.1s5006 CONVERSIONCTA count 0
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
19
LCP17.2sSpeed Index36.2sTBT11,700msPage weight66,426 KiB
- 🔥Your LCP at 17.2s is not a hero moment; it’s mission control watching the rocket arrive by bicycle.
💀
A fat payload and a panicking main thread turned this launch into orbital debris.
- →Defer non-critical scripts and split the 7,192 KiB of unused JavaScript into route-level chunks.
- →Compress and lazy-load media, especially the 241 images, and serve modern formats for anything above the fold.
- →Inline critical CSS, remove render-blocking resources, and trim the 20 long tasks with long-task profiling before they ambush interactivity.
02
SEO AUDIT
62
Meta descriptionmissingCanonicalmissingOpen Graph tagsabsentSEO score91
- 🔥Your meta description is empty, so search results get the thrilling plot twist of absolutely nothing.
💀
Search can find you, but your snippet and sharing setup are still operating with one shoe on.
- →Add a meta description under 160 characters with 'OSCE Mediko' and the primary value proposition in the first 60 characters.
- →Set a single canonical URL for the homepage and make sure every variant points to it.
- →Add complete Open Graph and Twitter card tags, including title, description, and a share image sized for social previews.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
87
Missing alt attributes166Images241Animated elements109Broken assets4
- 🔥There are 166 missing alt attributes across 241 images, so accessibility is doing reconnaissance without a map.
💀
The design is polished enough to impress humans, but the asset layer is dropping tools all over the floor.
- →Add meaningful alt text to every informative image and mark decorative assets as empty alt where appropriate.
- →Reduce or simplify the 109 animated elements and move motion-heavy effects to composited transforms only.
- →Fix the 404 on /logo/uw.svg and restore the two aborted video files, then recheck all media paths before shipping.
04
COPY AUDIT
67
Word count4,388Sentence count280Title tagOSCE MedikoSocial proof blocks2
- 🔥Your title is just 'OSCE Mediko,' which is the branding equivalent of a folder labeled 'stuff.'
💀
The copy knows what the brand is, but not how to land the message without wandering into brochure fog.
- →Rewrite the title tag to include the core service and location/value hook, not just the brand name.
- →Turn the H1 into one clear headline plus one supporting subhead instead of mixing Indonesian and English slogans in the same line.
- →Add a short benefits-led intro near the fold that explains who it’s for, what it solves, and why Mediko is credible.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
35
FCP4.1sLCP17.2sLong tasks20Buttons83
- 🔥First Contentful Paint at 4.1s is already asking for patience; LCP at 17.2s is where users start negotiating with their life choices.
💀
Users arrive, wait, and then get serenaded by interface noise before they can do anything useful.
- →Cut the number of visible actions above the fold and separate primary tasks from secondary navigation.
- →Preload the critical hero assets and delay everything else until after the first meaningful paint.
- →Fix the 404 console error from /logo/uw.svg so the page stops tripping over its own shoelaces during load.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
50
CTA count0Forms1Required inputs2Social proof blocks2
- 🔥CTA count is 0, so the page is basically a persuasive speech with no microphone.
💀
The page has interest, but the path to action is buried under hesitation and button confetti.
- →Add one primary CTA above the fold with action text like 'Daftar Simulasi' or 'Jadwalkan Demo' and repeat it after proof sections.
- →Simplify the form to the minimum required fields and label the submit button with an explicit outcome.
- →Add a pricing/next-step block near the first CTA so users know exactly what happens after they click.
Audit overview
oscemediko.id Audit Summary
The good news: the visual system is strong, with a clear hierarchy and solid trust signals. The bad news: performance is dragging the whole experience into the runway lights—LCP is 17.2s, Speed Index is 36.2s, interactive time is 143.5s, and Total Blocking Time hits 11,700ms. You’re also hauling 66,426 KiB of page weight, 7,192 KiB of unused JavaScript, and 20 long tasks, which is how a site turns a good first impression into a waiting room with ambitions.
Based on the category scores in this report, Design is the strongest area while Performance has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated oscemediko.id
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://www.oscemediko.id/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on May 8, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.