Loading Report View…
0/ 100
google.com Website Audit Report
google.com scored 55 out of 100 in this SavageAudit website audit covering Performance, SEO, Design, Copy, User Experience, and Conversion. The report uses captured website evidence to explain what is working, what is limiting the experience, and which improvements deserve attention first.
“A masterpiece of restraint that forgot the instructions for being useful.”
Google showed up with immaculate confidence and the culinary charm of an empty prep station. Everything is clean, familiar, and somehow still manages to leave you staring at the counter wondering where the meal went.
https://google.com/
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
The homepage is technically decent where it matters for speed: first contentful paint is 1.5s, largest contentful paint is 1.7s, and layout shift is a tame 0.023. But it still carries 690ms of total blocking time, 551KiB of unused JavaScript savings, 1 redirect, and a 7.7s interactive time, which is a pretty rude amount of hesitation for a page this stripped down. SEO is leaving money on the table with no meta description, no canonical, and zero structured data, while the page also returns a 429 in one audit path like it’s trying to swipe left on crawlers. Meanwhile, the page is all brand and no guidance: no headings, no viewport meta, 9 missing alt attributes, and a form with 12 inputs but no required fields, which is less funnel and more decorative plumbing.
Where It Burns
6 categoriesWebsite Audit Findings for google.com
SavageAudit identified 36 visible findings and recommendations across 6 audit categories. Each section below combines the category score with observed evidence and prioritized fixes.
8801 PERFORMANCEFCP 1.5s4702 SEOMeta description missing5403 DESIGNHeading count 03604 COPYWord count 526105 UXNav landmark missing3106 CONVERSIONCTA count 0
01
PERFORMANCE AUDIT
88
FCP1.5sLCP1.7sTBT690msUnused JS savings551KiB
- 🔥A first contentful paint of 1.5s and largest contentful paint of 1.7s are respectable, but the 690ms total blocking time is the part that shows up late and still makes a scene.
💀
Fast enough to tease, slow enough to annoy, and carrying a JavaScript pantry nobody touched.
- →Defer non-critical JavaScript and split the bundle so the 551KiB of unused JS stops blocking interactivity.
- →Remove the redirect from google.com to www.google.com by enforcing one canonical entry path at the edge.
- →Break up long tasks over 50ms and push the 690ms total blocking time below 200ms with code splitting and idle callbacks.
02
SEO AUDIT
47
Meta descriptionmissingCanonicalmissingSchema types0HTTP status in audit429
- 🔥The page has a title, but no meta description at all, which is like opening a restaurant and leaving the menu in the parking lot.
💀
Google built the search engine and then forgot to explain its own homepage to search engines.
- →Add a unique meta description under 160 characters with the primary keyword in the first 60 characters.
- →Set a self-referencing canonical tag for https://www.google.com/ and verify the preferred host is consistent.
- →Add JSON-LD for WebSite and Organization so search engines get actual context instead of architectural silence.
03
DESIGN AUDIT
54
Heading count0Missing alt text9Viewport meta tagmissingFont families7
- 🔥The page has 0 headings, which means the structure is being held together entirely by vibes and a very expensive logo.
💀
Beautifully branded, structurally naked, and one missing viewport away from chaos in a smaller screen.
- →Add a single H1 and a logical heading hierarchy to give the page an actual content skeleton.
- →Write descriptive alt text for all 9 images so accessibility stops being an afterthought.
- →Add a viewport meta tag and reduce font-family fallbacks to a tighter, intentional stack.
04
COPY AUDIT
36
Word count52Sentence count8CTA count0Social proof0
- 🔥Fifty-two words across eight sentences is less homepage copy and more a haiku with a branding budget.
💀
The copy is so sparse it feels like the homepage was told to whisper in an empty room.
- →Add one concise value proposition above the fold that says what the page does in plain language.
- →Introduce one primary CTA with action-oriented text instead of leaving the user to infer the next move.
- →Add a brief trust line or proof point and a contact route so the page stops acting mysterious on purpose.
05
UX AUDITUSER EXPERIENCE AUDIT
61
Nav landmarkmissingFooter landmarkmissingLong tasks10Required inputs0
- 🔥There’s no nav landmark and no footer landmark, which makes the page feel like a room with exits hidden in the wallpaper.
💀
Usable in theory, but structurally it behaves like a polished lobby with no signs and no receptionist.
- →Add semantic nav and footer landmarks so users can orient themselves without forensic archaeology.
- →Audit the 10 long tasks and reduce blocking work so interaction feels immediate, not negotiated.
- →Mark truly required fields in the form and group inputs into logical sections so the flow stops feeling like a tax audit.
06
CONVERSION AUDIT
31
CTA count0Form inputs12Required inputs0Contact detailsmissing
- 🔥CTA count is 0, which means the page offers all the presence of a sales pitch in a silent library.
💀
It is very good at being visited and extremely committed to not being chosen.
- →Add one clear primary CTA above the fold with a verb users can’t misread.
- →Reduce the form to the minimum viable fields and make only truly necessary inputs required.
- →Add contact details and one trust signal near the CTA so conversion has somewhere to land.
Audit overview
google.com Audit Summary
The homepage is technically decent where it matters for speed: first contentful paint is 1.5s, largest contentful paint is 1.7s, and layout shift is a tame 0.023. But it still carries 690ms of total blocking time, 551KiB of unused JavaScript savings, 1 redirect, and a 7.7s interactive time, which is a pretty rude amount of hesitation for a page this stripped down. SEO is leaving money on the table with no meta description, no canonical, and zero structured data, while the page also returns a 429 in one audit path like it’s trying to swipe left on crawlers. Meanwhile, the page is all brand and no guidance: no headings, no viewport meta, 9 missing alt attributes, and a form with 12 inputs but no required fields, which is less funnel and more decorative plumbing.
Based on the category scores in this report, Performance is the strongest area while Conversion has the most room for improvement.
How SavageAudit Evaluated google.com
SavageAudit evaluated the public website at https://google.com/ across performance, technical SEO, design, copy, user experience, and conversion signals. Scores and recommendations reflect the website evidence available when this audit was generated on April 2, 2026.
Similar Website Audit Reports
Compare this result with other public SavageAudit reports that received a similar overall website score.